STAY-HUMAN
-
"The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was “given” by a foreign power to another people for the creation of a new state. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty?"

- Bertrand Russell
Meanwhile in Iran…

Ninjutsu is considered to be one of the deadliest forms of martial arts in the world. But this doesn’t deter the 3,500 odd Iranian women who are currently receiving official training in the sport.

Tell them Muslim women are oppressed. I dare you.

Meanwhile in Iran…

Ninjutsu is considered to be one of the deadliest forms of martial arts in the world. But this doesn’t deter the 3,500 odd Iranian women who are currently receiving official training in the sport.

Tell them Muslim women are oppressed. I dare you.

Everyone is trying to save the Muslim woman; Western society must save her from Islam and Islamic society must save her from Western influence. No one – NO ONE – assumes that the Muslim woman can make up her own mind about what is best for her.

— Nadia El Awady

Demanding women’s bodies should be covered or uncovered, makes their bodies the ground on which battles of culture are fought. She is reduced to only her sex, objectified either in her being covered or in her being exposed. She becomes the stand-in symbol for either the past or the future, for religious anxiety and for nationalism.

Samhita dropping knowledge at Feministing about the ban on face veils in France.

Our own American misogyny (date rape, weak laws against domestic violence, glass ceilings, 79 cents for every man’s dollar) just looks more familiar to us, less harsh somehow, more workable. We think we can fix our own sexism with homegrown ingenuity, but we often assume that Muslim women’s problems must be solved for them from abroad, all their veils replaced with blue jeans for them to be truly liberated, all different marriage practices brought into conformity with our own. Muslim women and men have a wealth of their own cultural resources to use in the struggle for women’s human rights. Feminism is alive and well among Muslims and has been for some time, even when U.S. foreign policy interests don’t bring a spotlight on it. It is the continued struggle of Muslim feminists (both men and women), aided by friends of any background who are willing to educate themselves beyond stereotypes, which will liberate them. Not the condescending attitude that they must be “rescued” from their heritage by cheerfully ignorant proponents of American cultural imperialism or militaristic U.S. policymakers sprouting overnight feminist principles.

— Mohja Kahf, “Muslim Women Rule and Other Little-Known Facts”

However, if Tarek Mehanna is guilty, so am I. I, too, support the right of Muslims to defend themselves against US troops, even if that means they have to kill them, and I try to give the Iraqi resistance a voice through my website. I have done everything that Tarek Mehanna has done, and there are only two possibilities as to why I am not sitting in a cell with him: first, the FBI is incompetent and hasn’t been able to smoke me out; second, the US judicial system would never dream of violating my freedom of speech because I am white and I am a veteran of the occupation of Iraq.
-
I agree with him that much of what the US military has done in Iraq and Afghanistan can be characterized as terrorism, and I support Afghans and Iraqis who fight back against us. What I helped do to the city of Fallujah was terrorism, and I lost two dear friends in that operation, but I cannot hate or begrudge the resistance in Fallujah for killing them. They were only doing what I would have done had a foreign army been laying siege to my hometown. We were the aggressors and the terrorists, and I can see that now, eight years too late.
It’s not radical Islam that worries the US — it’s independence.

— Noam Chomsky (via fuckyeahchomsky)

Anonymous : What readings would you recommend for someone who wishes understand more about the politics of the middle east and the factors that have shaped it into what it is today? Why is there so much violence and bloodshed there, not only between invading armies and civilians, but between the people living there? How did it get to that state? I would love to read any books that can help me to understand this better. Thanks.

Well I won’t pretend to be an expert on all Middle Eastern politics- I mostly focus only on the Israel/Palestine conflict.

However, I feel like you’re under the impression that the Middle Eastern region is inherently a violent place, and that’s not true. From what I’ve read, the U.S. and Britain both have a much greater violent history of imperialism and colonization. The problem is that the “Western” history of bloodshed is repeatedly whitewashed while the violence and brutality in the Middle East is repeatedly emphasized by the media as it is used to justify Western imposition, intervention, and global hegemony; all of which usually aims to control natural resources, energy being one of the most prominent issues.

Furthermore, the “Middle East” isn’t one monotonous area, the different countries all have their own complex and lond winding histories. So I’m afraid you’d have to read about each one separately and read quite a lot to be well versed in the entire region XP

If we’re going to speak (very) broadly, there are many key reasons to look into that have factored greatly in the shaping of the Middle East. Firstly, the British made a great mess of things pretty much worldwide before finally leaving countries alone in a scattered mess. And Western intervention in Middle Eastern affairs didn’t just disappear after that (see Iran, where the US and UK instigated a coup to overthrow the democratically elected government and replace it with an authoritarian one). Then there are of course religious conflicts, for example the Sunni-Shia dynamic has a great role due to the large number of Muslims in the area. There’s been widespread corruption, with dictators who’ve generally been backed and propped up by the U.S. since they’ll sacrifice the good of their own people for Western interests as long as they themselves get to keep money and power. But again, this is extremely generally speaking because each country is very different from the next.

Okay now I’ve rambled on for long enough I should probably get to your question about book suggestions (sorry!).

For starters, I’ve made a list of book suggestions regarding Palestine here.

I’d also recommend Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror by Mahmood Mamdani as it provides a lot of insight regarding “cold war-era American complicity in the turbulence of the Muslim world through the waging of proxy wars […] Those familiar with Noam Chomsky’s recent work will likely find some of Mamdani’s arguments familiar, particularly his discussion of imperialistic political violence, racism, and the modern state. Where Mamdani is unique and particularly compelling, however, is in drawing on his African-studies background to back up his assertions about violence, terrorism and Islam.” It’s not focused explicitly on the Middle East but the ideas he discusses go a long way towards helping understand the violence in the Middle East that you mentioned.

I would also suggest checking out books personally recommended by Noam Chomsky on the Middle East. Just scroll down the list to the Middle East section (it’s alphabetical, the Terrorism and US Foreign Policy sections are also relevant). I don’t think you can ever go wrong with Chomsky ;)

And I still cannot stress how limiting it is to try to group the Middle East together- Saudi Arabia has a different history, Iran has a different history, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, etc. etc. Sure they intermingle here and there but you have to keep in mind that these countries have different cultures, traditions, histories, religious and ethnic dynamics- the prevailing view of the “Middle East” or the “Arab World” as one entity is extremely oversimplified and an obstacle when it comes to true understanding of the region. I honestly think you’re better off trying to read about individual countries and asking for books specifically on those. If you tell me about one of particular interest, I’ll do my best to help (without rambling next time, I promise!) or I’ll point you to one of many other great bloggers on here with better knowledge on whatever subject you’re interested in :)

Please torture me in the old way… Here they destroy people mentally and physically without leaving marks.

Letters From Guantanamo.

Shaker Aamer has been detained in Guantanamo for the past ten years without committing a single offence. “Fears are growing for the welfare of Mr Aamer, from south London, who is now 45 and has a wife and four children. He has never met his youngest son. His lawyers are particularly concerned by the deterioration of his mental and physical state, which Mr Aamer describes vividly in his letters. He has lost 40 per cent of his body weight and is suffering from health problems, aggravated by long periods in solitary confinement.” In one of his letters, Shaker writes to his loved one:

‎You are the soul of my life. You are the best of my heart. You are the light of my eyes. You are the oxygen in my lungs, you are the sun on my back, the sweetest taste of my mouth you are everything you are everything I need to live, to love, to be… Do you know how much you are important for my life. If you break I will break, if you become weak I will become weak and if you go I will go. You are my soul twin. I need you to be strong.

Ten agonizing, brutal years without justice conveniently labelled as “interrogation” and “safety measures” by the government of USA. I’m speechless. (via mehreenkasana)

On Religion and Revolution

So this is what I do in math class.

The idea that randomly wormed its way into my head is basically this; that if we didn’t believe in an afterlife, or second or third lives, we would never let injustice go as far as we do now. We would take to the streets and fight tooth and nail because this is all we we’ll ever have and this life right here is what we have to make the most of. The idea of an afterlife keeps people sedated, just put up with whatever’s thrown your way in this life because after all there’s a “perfect”, eternal life waiting for you. Grit your teeth and try to stay comfortable as possible where you are, there’s no point in bringing on even more hardship on yourself trying to “fight the system” when it’s temporary anyway.

Yeah the injustice is horrible but the people perpetrating the injustice will be punished “in the end” after all. I think the idea of divine justice carried out at the end of time by an almighty God (Allah, Jehova, whatever you call Him) plays a huge role in the amount of tolerance of injustice people have. It is human nature to want fairness, have you noticed how kids will make a fuss about the tiniest imbalance of scales but as we grow older we’re told more and more to “let it go”? We suppress our rage, we suppress the restlessness that is a result of oppression, and we suppress it because God’s gonna make up for everything later. Just stay put now. And if we don’t directly suffer ourselves, we feel as if though our “duty” against injustice to others in humanity is lifted off our shoulders because, again, God’s going to put them in Paradise for their suffering and those who made them suffer shall go to Hell.

Can you imagine, just for a second, if everyone suddenly stopped believing in religion? I don’t think anyone would be able to “tolerate” unfairness anymore, or just settle for “comfortable as possible” throughout this life. No one would yield to the the tyrants because why the fuck would you let them take the only thing you’ll ever have? And I think people’s need for justice would propel them to go after the few making life for the majority hell and make sure they suffer. It wouldn’t be pretty.

Now I’m not saying religion itself teaches us to be docile in the face of oppression, in fact many teach the opposite. Many religions preach the importance of justice and fairness and the right to fight for what is yours. But as the reality of the world is that many injustices go unanswered for and there is suffering caused by nature not just man, religion promises us compensation for these and I think that that has the negative side-effect of people becoming complacent. And I don’t just think that it’s the “idea” of an afterlife and divine justice that keep people down but also the fact that religious leaders teach you prayer > action. Worship the dogma, forget the principles. Pray to God that your injustices will be forgiven and those that are unjust to you will be punished. Instead of trying to eradicate wrong in this life, let’s let it be answered for in the next. Which, I think, is all completely bullshit, if religion preaches against injustice, and you truly believe in that religion, then should you not be trying your damn hardest to be true to the principles of your religion and fight against the oppression? I think the reason religious authority always conveniently leaves that part out is because then you might become a threat to their very own authority. It is the people in power, religious as well as political, that need to subjugate to keep their higher standing. If people were to realize that perhaps we need religious education and principle more than religious authority and dogma then maybe we’d overthrow those who garner power and wealth hypocritically under the banner of God.

Finally I understand that there are other things that keep people complacent; entertainment, materialism, hopelessness etc. etc. but I honestly think this underlying belief of something better later is a huge factor that keeps people in inaction. This was just me rambling about it from one viewpoint, what are your thoughts?

MORE BOOKS from Pakistan :D

  1. Jinnah of Pakistan by Stanley Wolpert

    “Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three. Hailed as “Great Leader” (Quaid-i-Azam), Muhammad Ali Jinnah virtually conjured Pakistan into statehood by the force of his indomitable will. His place of primacy in the world’s history looms like a lofty minaret over the achievements of all his contemporaries. He began his political career as a leader of India’s National Congress and until after World War I remained India’s best ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity. Owing to Hindus’ bias towards the minority Muslims, he later launched a freedom movement whose aim was to carve an independent Muslim state free of all kinds of subjugation. He was an enigmatic figure and more powerful than any of his contemporary leaders; indeed, he was one of recent history’s most charismatic leaders.”

  2. Jinnah: Speeches and Statements 1947-1948

    This book is like a thousand dollars on Amazon :| Sorry I had to mention that because I got it for like …eight.

    The last year of Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s life saw the culmination of his mission and the formative phase of the state he had created. He was then the Governor-General of Pakistan and President of the constituent Assembly. These speeches and statements are essential for understanding his vision of Pakistan.

    Was it to be a democracy or a theocracy? What were to be the guiding principles of foreign policy and economic emancipation, the basis of centre-province relations, the language problem, and the role of civil and military bureaucracy? The image of Pakistan, emerging from these speeches and statements, is that of a modern social welfare state ensuring equal opportunities for all, regardless of religion, race and region. Containing some ninety-two speeches and statements of the Quaid-I-Azam, this will be the essential guide for students and researchers. The book carries a very comprehensive Introduction by the eminent scholar and historian, S.M. Burke, and a Preface by Mohammad Ali Siddiqui, well-known columnist and currently Director of the Quaid-I-Azam Academy.

  3. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam by Allama Muhammad Iqbal

    And this is the book I’m most excited to read, because Iqbal is amazing.

    To have a succession of identical thoughts and feelings is to have no thoughts and feelings at all. Such is the lot of most Muslim countries today. They are mechanically repeating old values…”

    The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam
    is a compilation of lectures delivered by Muhammad Iqbal on Islamic philosophy; it was published in 1930. These lectures were delivered by Iqbal in Madras, Hyderabad, and Aligarh. The last chapter, “Is Religion Possible”, was added to the book from the 1934 Oxford Edition onwards. In Reconstruction, Iqbal called for a re-examination of the intellectual foundations of Islamic philosophy. The book is a major work of modern Islamic thought.

    You can read the book online here.

LOL according to this site Reform Judaism and Sikhism are pretty much the exact same thing…?

At first I was confused as to why Islam wasn’t on the list and I had a feeling it had to do with interpretation on issues like abortion (since I mentioned I was pro-choice) so I went and checked their description of Islam and I was right (bottom picture) -_-” Way to twist faith with the cultural beliefs of the majority of followers. “Gender roles are prescribed” Bahh.

On a different note; Daisy teach me about Judaism!


Biggest GPOY ever. Ever.

Biggest GPOY ever. Ever.

Pakistan Book List:
  1. Asrar-i-Khudi by Allama (Muhammad) Iqbal
  2. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam by Allama Iqbal
  3. Pakistan: A Personal History by Imran Khan
  4. Jinnah of Pakistan by Stanley Wolpert
  5. Jinnah Creator of Pakistan by Hector Bolitho

Here’s to hoping I can actually find all of these. *still wishing I could get the one on Jinnah from Amazon but it’s freaking $500*

»